Page 1 of 2

"Justice" Roberts is at again

Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2020 9:48 am
by tector
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/509 ... ndoned-his

Probably the most disappointing "conservative" justice ever.

Re: "Justice" Roberts is at again

Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2020 9:58 am
by REDinFL
Recently, that commie hag joy behar (lower case deliberate) suggests that democrats (ditto) lie about their leftist positions, to get elected, then do what they want. I have to wonder if that concept hasn't been in place for decades. All too many "conservatives" turn out to be subversives, with results no better than if they actually were leftist activists. Maybe they were to begin with? How about Souter?

And, for the racists out there. The black guy (Justice Thomas) is the best of the bunch in the SCOTUS.

Re: "Justice" Roberts is at again

Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2020 10:06 am
by TACC
I agree, we need more dedicated conservative justices.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk


Re:

Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2020 10:29 am
by n0rlf
TACC wrote: Sat Jul 25, 2020 10:06 am I agree, we need more dedicated conservative justices.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Actually I disagree. We need justices that actually uphold the constitution. Not vote along a party line. We have had that for far too long and it is part of the problem.

Now in this case I think scotus got it wrong. But that is due to how the constitution is written not due to any Justice's party. Unfortunately we see that the justices do tend to rule along the party lines. That is wrong no matter which side is doing it.

Yeah I know, Utopia and all that but if we do not push for the correct way who will. What are we teaching young people and our children?

Sadly I am afraid it no longer matters as this once great country is tearing itself apart. Again along party lines.

Just my humble opinion and ymmv.

Re:

Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2020 11:13 am
by REDinFL
TACC wrote: Sat Jul 25, 2020 10:06 am I agree, we need more dedicated conservative justices.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Provided you define "conservative" as following the Constitution. Some "conservatives" can be equally unpalatable as the left, with their own brand of extremism.

Re: "Justice" Roberts is at again

Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2020 10:23 pm
by TACC
I agree with both of you guys and probably should have labeled it differently such as staunch constitionalists.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk


Re: "Justice" Roberts is at again

Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2020 10:25 pm
by Captain Steinbrenner
n0rlf wrote:
TACC wrote: Sat Jul 25, 2020 10:06 am I agree, we need more dedicated conservative justices.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Actually I disagree. We need justices that actually uphold the constitution. Not vote along a party line. We have had that for far too long and it is part of the problem.

Now in this case I think scotus got it wrong. But that is due to how the constitution is written not due to any Justice's party. Unfortunately we see that the justices do tend to rule along the party lines. That is wrong no matter which side is doing it.

Yeah I know, Utopia and all that but if we do not push for the correct way who will. What are we teaching young people and our children?

Sadly I am afraid it no longer matters as this once great country is tearing itself apart. Again along party lines.

Just my humble opinion and ymmv.
Agree with you Image


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: "Justice" Roberts is at again

Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 2:05 am
by BIG JOE
The next President will likely nominate a new supreme court justice. The court has always been political. It starts way before the selection and confirmation of a new justice. When we lost the late Justice John Scalia we truly lost one of the best. You did not have to agree with his rulings, but a lot of them were made by his ideals and of course some politics. Once being grilled by the press about one of his ruling's his response " Because I said so ". I would agree we need a new justice that rules by the constitution and not Party Lines. Unfortunately just to get close to being nominated you have to play politics.

Re: "Justice" Roberts is at again

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2020 11:35 am
by GunsandHoses
REDinFL wrote: Sat Jul 25, 2020 9:58 am Recently, that commie hag joy behar (lower case deliberate) suggests that democrats (ditto) lie about their leftist positions, to get elected, then do what they want. I have to wonder if that concept hasn't been in place for decades. All too many "conservatives" turn out to be subversives, with results no better than if they actually were leftist activists. Maybe they were to begin with? How about Souter?

And, for the racists out there. The black guy (Justice Thomas) is the best of the bunch in the SCOTUS.
I agree Red, Justice Thomas is one of the best! AND, behar is a HUUUGE piece of SHIT!

Re: "Justice" Roberts is at again

Posted: Sat Aug 08, 2020 8:43 am
by 45caldan
Lost all faith in him when he went along with the penalty (which he said was fine if it was considered a "tax") forced on Americans not willing (or able to afford) to purchase Obamacare!

How in the hell was it constitutional to FORCE Americans to buy a PRODUCT???