Facebook hypocrisy.

If it doesn't fit in any of the other forums, post it here!
P5 Guy
Posts: 508
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 1:20 pm
Location: St Pete

Re: Facebook hypocrisy.

Post by P5 Guy » Sun Dec 01, 2019 8:54 am

Are you suggesting we should have government intervention to force a private company to allow content they do not wish to have?
You WILL! bake that cake! And you WILL! like it!

Facebook, twitter &c are all shilling for fascists, period. Total control of the peasants by the multibillionaires is their plan. Has that already started with Donald J Trump?

User avatar
Firemedic2000
Posts: 473
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2018 4:01 pm
Location: Tampa Bay

Post by Firemedic2000 » Sun Dec 01, 2019 1:41 pm

Grip Hugger wrote:
Sat Nov 30, 2019 9:28 pm
Allme wrote:
Sat Nov 30, 2019 7:44 pm
I keep forgetting this is fudd central. You all missed the point, thanks just the same.
Really? Have you ever been to FSN shoots? Not too many traditional rifles and lots and lots of black rifle weaponry. I get your point that FB suppresses pro second amendment sales and opinions and promotes anti second opinions thus letting the cops advertise freely their gun buy back. But really do you expect anything else from that liberal cesspool? No need to insult the folks here calling us all fudds. Someone might think you are a dick.
I know one person that already does for that comment :mrgreen:
RANGER AIRBORNE, FIREMEDIC, NRA BENEFACTOR, OATH KEEPER
In the Government's/Elitist eye's I'm a Terrorist for believing in the Constitution and taking an oath to defend it instead of destroying it

User avatar
gforester
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2018 12:58 pm
Location: Cocoa, FL and Fort Payne, AL

Post by gforester » Sun Dec 01, 2019 1:53 pm

Facebook? What is Facebook? :?

User avatar
Firemedic2000
Posts: 473
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2018 4:01 pm
Location: Tampa Bay

Post by Firemedic2000 » Sun Dec 01, 2019 1:53 pm

Are you suggesting we should have government intervention to force a private company to allow content they do not wish to have?
No one said that. Just to have these RADICAL LEFT WING SOCIALIST sites enforce their rules equally and not just against CONSERVATIVE AMERICA.

They allow the LEFT WING SOCIALIST EXTREMISTS to attack conservative Americans yet if something is said against them or about their political leaders.

Our posts are Deleted, warnings, time out or banned.

Using some B.S. calling it hate speech or unvalidated post.
I posted actual quotes from extremists on their site with links. Criticising fb allowing this kind of posts.

I got my post deleted as hate speech for just pointing what they were allowing the LIBERAL SOCIALIST EXTREMISTS to post and get away with.

FB is a monster information weapon being used to attack the right and promote the DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST EXTREMISTS PARTY.

So yes the government should regulate them. Just like the NEWS MEDIA should be held accountable for lying.

The 1st Admendment was designed to protect those telling the truth from persecution. Not protect those that lie.
RANGER AIRBORNE, FIREMEDIC, NRA BENEFACTOR, OATH KEEPER
In the Government's/Elitist eye's I'm a Terrorist for believing in the Constitution and taking an oath to defend it instead of destroying it

User avatar
Iosef
Posts: 88
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2018 8:42 pm

Post by Iosef » Sun Dec 01, 2019 5:59 pm

sooo... Buy FB, then you'll get to make the rules :-)

Taco
Posts: 103
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2018 3:00 pm
Location: Clermont

Post by Taco » Sun Dec 01, 2019 6:17 pm

Firemedic2000 wrote:
Sun Dec 01, 2019 1:53 pm
Are you suggesting we should have government intervention to force a private company to allow content they do not wish to have?

The 1st Amendment was designed to protect those telling the truth from persecution. Not protect those that lie.
The first amendment (as well as the rest), was designed to protect us from the government. Based on your request for regulations, it sounds like you wish to roll back their rights of free speech, not bolster it.

Protecting the Constitution involves protecting the rights of others, even when you don't agree. After all, you wouldn't need to protect speech you agreed with.

User avatar
Skoll
Posts: 828
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2018 2:39 pm
Location: New Mexico, formerly WPB

Post by Skoll » Sun Dec 01, 2019 6:33 pm

Kind of a head scratcher how some of you think the 1st works and that it applies to private entities. Do the adult thing and don't use Facebook.
"The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted."

TC6969
Posts: 452
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2018 2:40 pm
Location: Wimauma

Post by TC6969 » Sun Dec 01, 2019 7:59 pm

Skoll wrote:
Sun Dec 01, 2019 6:33 pm
Kind of a head scratcher how some of you think the 1st works and that it applies to private entities.
Trust me, its not just here. :roll:

User avatar
lakelandman
Posts: 499
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2018 1:12 am
Location: Lakeland

Post by lakelandman » Mon Dec 02, 2019 10:30 pm

Facebook needs to change its Name to double standards.
Everybody's got plans... until they get hit.

User avatar
gforester
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2018 12:58 pm
Location: Cocoa, FL and Fort Payne, AL

Post by gforester » Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:17 am

lakelandman wrote:
Mon Dec 02, 2019 10:30 pm
Facebook needs to change its Name to double standards.
How about Two-facedbook? I just don't do anything Facebook related, or Twitter, Snapchat or even Paypal for that matter.

Post Reply