Florida Shooters Network

I agree with tector, I actually thought that the case from Hawaii would have been a better choice to get accomplished what we are hoping for

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

I thought the specific question the SCOTUS would be addressing is if the 2nd amendment protects the ability to carry concealed outside of your house/property for self defense purposes . From FPC In granting the petition, the Court limited the question presented to: “Whether the State's denial of pet...

Miamioffshore and DammitGrif got it right.

Especially with their new Quarentine rules. they can have that country.

Done great job.

5 sent everyone in my family

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Great job,

Keep up the hard work

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Thanks for the assist.

The problem i see with the HEAR act is if it passes, it has a registry already and would be a no brainer on collection since you can't sell them out right, and you can't "destroy" them without notifying the aft.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Great deal, way to reach out to others on a different medium.

Keep the great work.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Just saw this on the Fox News blurb. If someone can assist in the adding of the article I would appreciate it. Synopsis us: HEAR act = try to make suppressors illegal, the government will buy them back or you turn into a felon after a short time. SHUSH act = keep them as they are Sent from my SM-G96...

rentprop1 wrote:funny how ammo inventories never mattered when it wasn't over $ 1 a round

I agree,

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Sent more emails

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk