by mohshard » Tue Dec 15, 2009 8:34 am
One of the big jokes about the SAR 8 is that it's the cheapest way to get an m1a from springfield when it breaks. Lifetime warranty, and no g3 type parts at Springfield = m1a for you. At the time, ammo was going cheap so it was easy to wear a gun out...
Here's my opinion. I've shot both, and the g3 left me cold. More recoil, worse ergonomics, (charging handle is almost impossible to actuate lying prone or with your shooting hand), brass is destroyed by fluted chamber, collapsible stock is about as comfortable as rebar. Gun is reliable, accurate enough, easy to scope, parts kits cheap these days, mags VERY cheap still. Lots of people like them, and you'll find a deal sometimes.
FAL. Better ergonomics, for me. As the gun gets dirtier, or if the ammo's weak, give it more gas to work the action. As simple as turning a knob a few clicks. PARA, (folding), setup costs about 3-500 more than fixed stock. Easy to maintain, parts still inexpensive. Mags are getting harder to find more expensive. VERY soft shooting for a 308 battle rifle. DSA makes what is considered the best US receiver, followed by DCI, Entreprise, then Century and ORF, (may require major work). You can also by guns built on Imbel, FN Belgian, or FMAP receivers.
There's two major flavors, Inch and Metric. Metric, (STG/G1, Israeli, Chilean Imbel, Brazilian Imbel, Argentine FMAPS, South African/Rhody R1s) is more common, and the mags are still cheap, around 10-20 dollars for usable mags. Inch, used by the commonwealth countries, NZ, AUS, UK, etc, has many parts interchangeable with metric. Mags are 20-30 still, as less were imported. To cloud the issue, Century built "mixmaster" guns with inch uppers and metric lowers, or vice versa.
Find someone local with either, shoot them, and decide. I shot a Cetme and didn't love it. Glad it didn't cost me $4-900 to make that decision.